|
Newly established in the Philippines and firmly entrenched in
Hawaii at the turn of the century, the United States had high
hopes for a vigorous trade with China. However, Japan and
various European nations had acquired established spheres of
influence there in the form of naval bases, leased territories,
monopolistic trade rights, and exclusive concessions for
investing in railway construction and mining.
Idealism in American foreign policy existed alongside the
desire to compete with Europe's imperial powers in the Far East.
The U.S. government thus insisted as a matter of principle upon
equality of commercial privileges for all nations. In
September 1899, Secretary of State John Hay advocated an "Open
Door" for all nations in China – that is, equality of trading
opportunities (including equal tariffs, harbor duties, and
railway rates) in the areas Europeans controlled. Despite its
idealistic component, the Open Door, in essence, was a
diplomatic maneuver that sought the advantages of colonialism
while avoiding the stigma of its frank practice. It had
limited success.
With the Boxer Rebellion of 1900, the Chinese struck out
against foreigners. In June, insurgents seized Beijing and
attacked the foreign legations there. Hay promptly announced to
the European powers and Japan that the United States would
oppose any disturbance of Chinese territorial or administrative
rights and restated the Open Door policy. Once the rebellion was
quelled, Hay protected China from crushing indemnities.
Primarily for the sake of American good will, Great Britain,
Germany, and lesser colonial powers formally affirmed the Open
Door policy and Chinese independence. In practice, they
consolidated their privileged positions in the country.
A few years later, President Theodore Roosevelt mediated the
deadlocked Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05, in many respects a
struggle for power and influence in the northern Chinese
province of Manchuria. Roosevelt hoped the settlement
would provide open-door opportunities for American business, but
the former enemies and other imperial powers succeeded in
shutting the Americans out. Here as elsewhere, the United
States was unwilling to deploy military force in the service of
economic imperialism. The president could at least content
himself with the award of the Nobel Peace Prize (1906).
Despite gains for Japan, moreover, U.S. relations with the proud
and newly assertive island nation would be intermittently
difficult through the early decades of the 20th century.
|