The Townshend Acts  | 
			
| 
				 
 The Townshend Acts were designed to raise revenue that would 
				be used in part to support colonial officials and maintain the 
				British army in America. In response, Philadelphia lawyer John 
				Dickinson, in Letters of a Pennsylvania Farmer, argued 
				that Parliament had the right to control imperial commerce but 
				did not have the right to tax the colonies, whether the duties 
				were external or internal. The agitation following enactment of the Townshend duties was 
				less violent than that stirred by the Stamp Act, but it was 
				nevertheless strong, particularly in the cities of the Eastern 
				seaboard. Merchants once again resorted to non-importation 
				agreements, and people made do with local products. Colonists, 
				for example, dressed in homespun clothing and found substitutes 
				for tea. They used homemade paper and their houses went 
				unpainted. In Boston, enforcement of the new regulations 
				provoked violence. When customs officials sought to collect 
				duties, they were set upon by the populace and roughly handled. 
				For this infraction, two British regiments were dispatched to 
				protect the customs commissioners. The presence of British troops in Boston was a standing 
				invitation to disorder. On March 5, 1770, antagonism between 
				citizens and British soldiers again flared into violence. What 
				began as a harmless snowballing of British soldiers degenerated 
				into a mob attack.  Someone gave the order to fire. When 
				the smoke had cleared, three Bostonians lay dead in the snow. 
				Dubbed the "Boston Massacre," the incident was dramatically 
				pictured as proof of British heartlessness and tyranny. Faced with such opposition, Parliament in 1770 opted for a strategic retreat and repealed all the Townshend duties except that on tea, which was a luxury item in the colonies, imbibed only by a very small minority. To most, the action of Parliament signified that the colonists had won a major concession, and the campaign against England was largely dropped. A colonial embargo on "English tea" continued but was not too scrupulously observed. Prosperity was increasing and most colonial leaders were willing to let the future take care of itself.  | 
			
Click here to print. Answer Key: (1) Charles Townshend, (2) that taxes imposed on goods imported by the colonies were legal while internal taxes (like the Stamp Act) were not, (3) John Dickinson, (4) Boston Massacre.  | 
			
![]()  | 
		    
|---|
Text courtesy of the U.S. State Department, Bureau of International Information Programs, 2005  | 
  


The year 1767 brought another series of measures that stirred 
				anew all the elements of discord. Charles Townshend, British 
				chancellor of the exchequer, attempted a new fiscal program in 
				the face of continued discontent over high taxes at home. Intent 
				upon reducing British taxes by making more efficient the 
				collection of duties levied on American trade, he tightened 
				customs administration and enacted duties on colonial imports of 
				paper, glass, lead, and tea from Britain.  The "Townshend 
				Acts" were based on the premise that taxes imposed on goods 
				imported by the colonies were legal while internal taxes (like 
				the Stamp Act) were not.











