Students are asked to compare and contrast feudal Japan and feudal Europe, including: ruler, system of vassalage, economy, warrior code(s), role of women, role of religion, time period, what type of government existed before feudalism, why and how did feudalism develop, what brought about the end of feudalism, learning, literature, arts, and education.
Click here to print this chart worksheet. Answers will vary.
Feudal Japan and feudal Europe, though separated by geography and culture, shared several similarities as well as distinct differences in their political and social structures.
Similarities include the foundation of both societies on a hierarchical system based on land ownership, loyalty, and military service. In both systems, power was decentralized, with land controlled by local lords--daimyo in Japan and nobles in Europe--who ruled over peasants. Warriors played central roles: samurai in Japan and knights in Europe served their lords and followed strict codes of conduct, such as Bushido and chivalry. Both societies also had monarchs (emperors or kings) whose power was largely ceremonial, with real authority held by the shogun in Japan and lords or kings with strong vassal support in Europe.
Differences include the role of religion: in Europe, the Catholic Church held significant influence over politics and daily life, while in Japan, Shinto and Buddhism played more spiritual and cultural roles without dominating government. Inheritance and landholding systems also differed, as Japanese feudal positions were often hereditary but under tighter central control, especially during the Tokugawa period. Additionally, Japanese feudalism lasted longer and maintained peace more successfully under the Tokugawa shogunate, while European feudalism gradually declined after the Middle Ages due to changing political, economic, and social conditions.
Overall, both systems reflected unique responses to the need for order and stability in their respective societies. |
