Writing Exercises on the Jacksonian Era

Writing Exercises: Jacksonian Era

www.studenthandouts.com > U.S. History > Westward Expansion > Worksheets

1. Explain how and why the Democratic-Republican party split.

2. Analyze how changes in voting requirements may have played a role in Jackson’s election to the presidency.

3. Describe the spoils system.

4. Summarize the events surrounding the Trail of Tears.

5. Discuss the pros and cons of the theory of nullification from the perspectives of both the federal and state governments.

Click here to print (PDF). Answers will vary.

The theory of nullification is a contentious concept in American history that revolves around the idea that individual states have the right to declare federal laws unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable within their borders. This theory was notably championed by proponents of states' rights in the antebellum period, particularly during the Nullification Crisis of 1832-1833. Here are the pros and cons of nullification from the perspectives of both the federal and state governments.

From the Perspective of State Governments (Pros):

Protection of States' Rights: Nullification proponents argue that it serves as a check on federal power, protecting the sovereignty of individual states and their ability to govern themselves as they see fit.
Defense Against Unconstitutional Federal Laws: States may view nullification as a means to resist and prevent the enforcement of federal laws they consider unconstitutional or harmful to their interests.
Preservation of Local Values: Nullification allows states to preserve and uphold their unique cultural, social, and political values without interference from the federal government.
States as Laboratories of Democracy: Nullification advocates argue that it enables states to experiment with different policies and laws, fostering innovation and diversity in governance.

From the Perspective of Federal Government (Cons):

Constitutional Authority: Opponents argue that the Constitution grants the federal government supremacy over state laws (Supremacy Clause, Article VI), making nullification unconstitutional and undermining the rule of law.
Risk of Chaos: Critics contend that nullification can lead to a breakdown in the enforcement of federal laws, potentially creating a chaotic legal environment where individual states pick and choose which laws to obey.
Threat to National Unity: Nullification efforts can exacerbate regional tensions and threaten the unity of the nation. They may lead to conflicts and divisions between states and the federal government.
Historical Precedent: Nullification has historical associations with states' attempts to resist federal anti-slavery laws in the 19th century, which most view as a dark chapter in American history.
Inconsistency and Uncertainty: Nullification can create uncertainty for citizens and businesses when laws are selectively enforced based on state interpretations, potentially leading to economic and legal challenges.

It is important to note that the theory of nullification has been largely discredited by legal scholars and the federal government. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case of Cooper v. Aaron (1958) reaffirmed the supremacy of federal law and the federal judiciary in interpreting the Constitution.

While states have mechanisms to challenge federal laws through the courts, nullification as a unilateral state action remains a highly controversial and legally questionable concept. The debate over nullification underscores the ongoing tension between states' rights and federal authority in the United States.

Westward Expansion Books and Films	Westward Expansion Miscellany

Westward Expansion Maps and Pictures	Westward Expansion Outlines and Powerpoints

Westward Expansion Learning Games	Westward Expansion Worksheets

www.studenthandouts.com > U.S. History > Westward Expansion > Worksheets