| Curriculum Counts: Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards |
| Presented by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and the Center for State and Local Leadership at the Manhattan Institute on February 28, 2013 in New York, New York, U.S.A. |
| Miscellaneous > Students Handouts News Archives > Student Handouts 2013 News Archives |
|
Watch
live streaming video from
manhattan_institute at livestream.com
|
New York, NY (February 28, 2013)
- A panel of educational leaders met at the Harvard Club today
to discuss implementation of the Common Core in schools across
the United States as part of Curriculum Counts: Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards. Sol Stern of City Journal introduced the group, which included Merryl Tisch, Tony Bennett, Linda Bevilacqua, and Kathleen Porter-Magee. |
| Beginning with Sol Stern, the discussion panel advocated for
implementation of the Common Core; differences in members'
opinions dealt with how the Common Core should be implemented,
as well as creating accurate student assessments. Guests heard a succinct history of the movement, from its conception under E.D. Hirsch, founder and chairperson of the Core Knowledge Foundation. At its most basic, the Common Core is a systemic shift from the Progressive educational theories that have shaped schooling in the United States since the first half of the twentieth century. For numerous reasons, the Common Core has been charged with everything from elitism to racism. Saving this debate for another day, the reality is that 45 states have signed onto the Common Core, many in response to President Barack Obama's Race to the Top initiative. Over the next several years, most American teachers, students, and parents will become familiar with the Common Core over the coming years. |
 Merryl Tisch, Chancellor to the New York State Board of Regents, described her journey to recognition of the Common Core as a necessary tool for improving New York's schools. She and her colleagues saw that 75% of NYCDE (New York City Department of Education) graduates studying in CUNY (City University of New York) colleges required remedial coursework; after six years in the CUNY system, less than 25% of NYCDE graduates had completed a college degree. Dr. Tisch recognized that these students were "not only not college-ready, but not career-ready." Dr. Tisch has participated in Engage New York, a website that provides free Common Core educational materials to educators. In the coming weeks, many students in New York will be tested along Common Core guidelines, which is causing a bit of panic locally. Dr. Tisch advises that the success rate on the Common Core test will reflect the college-ready numbers. Of course, with the Common Core so new, and existing college-ready students so few, this statement implies that the forthcoming Common Core test scores are expected to be quite poor. |
 Tony
Bennett, Florida's Commissioner of Education, discussed the
implementation of the Common Core from a state perspective. One
of the biggest tasks ahead of the states is the public relations
battle to illustrate to families that the Common Core is best
for their children, state, and country. That is, implementation
of the Common Core is not simply another standards adoption to
which teachers can align their existing lesson plans.
"Data-driven accountability will lead us to change," according
to Dr. Bennett, and the Common Core correspond to ACT and SAT
results. States must communicate the movement to the Common Core
as a transformative initiative that will result in graduating
seniors who are career- and college-ready. |
 Linda
Bevilacqua of the
Core Knowledge Foundation stresses the importance of
implementation of the Common Core standards, rather than the
standards themselves. She warns against six traps to proper
implementation: (1) a myopic focus on aligning to the letter
rather than to the spirit of the standards; (2) in an effort to
include nonfiction texts, adding them haphazardly with no common
theme; (3) a failure to understand vocabulary growth; (4) a
failure to understand the importance of knowledge acquisition in
the early grades; (5) ignorance of the role of listening and
speaking skills in language development; and (6) a failure to
recognize the need for curriculum-based testing to replace the
current skills-based testing. Dr. Bevilacqua recommends assigning certain content area domains to each elementary grade so that teachers know what sort of content area vocabulary students are expected to know. For example, a state might tell teachers that fourth-graders are required to be proficient regarding, among other things, the U.S. Civil War. In anticipation of state testing, fourth-grade teachers would then include both fiction and nonfiction content-rich reading and writing during the school year. Instead of learning how to answer generic questions, students would learn the vocabulary and background knowledge necessary to comprehend readings on the subject, effectively write about it, etc. And of course, the hoped-for long-term result would be students who are effective communicators who also happen to possess a significant degree of knowledge on the U.S. Civil War. |
 Kathleen
Porter-Magee of the
Thomas B. Fordham Institute describes Common Core
implementation as both a systemic reform movement and a
classroom reform movement. She warns that classroom-level reform
is much more difficult to achieve, and that pushing for too much
change too quickly could have negative consequences. Also
important, according to Ms. Porter-Magee, is recognizing what
truly is aligned to the Common Core as opposed to what has
merely been rubber-stamped; e.g., don't just listen to the
guarantees of publishing companies. (Information on the Common
Core Implementation Rubric Tool can be found
here.) Additionally, it will be vital to get the Common Core
assessments right. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|---|
| Miscellaneous > Students Handouts News Archives > Student Handouts 2013 News Archives |
